The topic studies functional and enriched foods, or foods with health claims, and how consumers judge them. It asks who buys them and why, how far consumers trust health and nutrition claims and how much they are willing to pay. It uses choice experiments, conjoint analysis, experimental auctions and consumer segmentation. Studies cover probiotics, breads and cereals, dairy products, marmalades and new ingredients. Recent research looks at combining health and sustainability in snacks, foods enriched with by-products, high-protein products for athletes, spirulina and consumption trends for functional foods.
Description written by AI from the keywords, journals, most-cited works and recent works of the topic.
The last share tells how far the topic passes through few hands: in the field it ranges from 12% to 39%. 21% means that the topic has some reference groups but remains widespread. Signatures are counted, not papers: an article with four authors on the topic weighs four times, because the question is how much of the work passes through few people.
The topic is declining: citations received by its papers went from 693 (2020–2022) to 863 (2023–2025), while those of the whole field grew 1.55 times. Citations received in those years by all papers on the topic are counted, including older ones.
By papers on the topic. The last column still shows specialisation, to tell apart those who work on it a lot in absolute terms from those who work on it above all.
Not those who published the most on it, but those who devote the largest share of their output to it compared with the field average. Above 1 there is specialisation; the tick marks parity. Researchers with fewer than three papers on the topic are excluded.
| Name | Institution | Papers on the topic | Specialisation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azzurra Annunziata | Università degli Studi di Napoli "Parthenope" | 12 | 19.02 |
| Raffaele Zanchini | Università degli Studi di Torino | 5 | 11.00 |
| Rosaria Viscecchia | Università degli Studi di Foggia | 5 | 10.63 |
| Gioacchino Pappalardo | Università degli Studi di Catania | 8 | 10.11 |
| Francesco Bimbo | Università degli Studi di Foggia | 4 | 9.59 |
| Riccardo Vecchio | Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II | 11 | 9.53 |
| Claudio Bellia | Università degli Studi di Catania | 3 | 7.58 |
| Daniela Ivana Laura Spina | Università degli Studi di Catania | 4 | 5.50 |
| Biagio Pecorino | Università degli Studi di Catania | 4 | 5.06 |
| Gaetano Chinnici | Università degli Studi di Catania | 5 | 4.99 |
The number tells how much work on the topic comes from each institution; specialisation tells how much the topic weighs within the institution compared with the field average. A small, focused institution can be more specialised than a large one that does everything.
| Institution | Papers on the topic | Specialisation |
|---|---|---|
| Università degli Studi di Catania | 46 | 3.18 |
| Università degli Studi di Foggia | 21 | 2.23 |
| Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II | 19 | 3.60 |
| Università degli Studi di Napoli "Parthenope" | 16 | 5.48 |
| Università degli Studi di Palermo | 13 | 1.68 |
| Università Politecnica delle Marche | 10 | 2.31 |
| Università degli Studi di Torino | 10 | 2.05 |
| Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro | 8 | 1.59 |
| CREA – Centro di ricerca Politiche e Bioeconomia | 6 | 0.81 |
| Foreign institutions | 6 | 0.80 |
The topics that most often appear in the same papers. The number is the papers in common.