07/AGRI-01 — Agricultural and Food Economics and Rural Appraisal

Landscape and rural heritage

Research topic of the field
157
publications
3,436
citations
117
researchers
33
institutions
62%
in Q1 journals
The topics most often intertwined with this one, year by year

The topic studies agricultural landscapes and rural heritage as assets to protect and enhance: farm and forest landscapes, historic rural buildings, cultural sites and green spaces. It asks what they are worth to citizens and tourists, using choice experiments, contingent valuation and the travel cost method, and how policies, starting from the CAP, affect their conservation. Recent research looks at the emotions of tourists and residents in landscape restoration after extreme events, environmental justice in rural landscapes changing with the climate, the refurbishment of rural buildings and new tools, such as augmented reality, to engage young people with heritage.

Description written by AI from the keywords, journals, most-cited works and recent works of the topic.

01
Indicators
Output and impact
63
publications since 2021
51
publications 2016–2020
+24%
compared with 2016–2020
23%
share signed by the most active 5%

The last share tells how far the topic passes through few hands: in the field it ranges from 12% to 39%. 23% means that the topic has some reference groups but remains widespread. Signatures are counted, not papers: an article with four authors on the topic weighs four times, because the question is how much of the work passes through few people.

Trend over time and quality of outlets

Documents and citations per year

documentscitations received
2050015375102505125002006: 1 documents20062008: 3 documents20082009: 2 documents2010: 6 documents20102011: 2 documents2012: 2 documents20122013: 7 documents2014: 8 documents20142015: 11 documents2016: 4 documents20162017: 10 documents2018: 11 documents20182019: 13 documents2020: 13 documents20202021: 14 documents2022: 13 documents20222023: 11 documents2024: 12 documents20242025: 6 documents20252006: 0 citations received2007: 0 citations received2008: 5 citations received2009: 8 citations received2010: 13 citations received2011: 15 citations received2012: 30 citations received2013: 43 citations received2014: 49 citations received2015: 90 citations received2016: 110 citations received2017: 121 citations received2018: 175 citations received2019: 198 citations received2020: 247 citations received2021: 314 citations received2022: 377 citations received2023: 374 citations received2024: 431 citations received2025: 439 citations received
Citations received each year by papers on the topic.

Journal quartiles (SJR · SCImago)

143with SJR
Q1 89 (62%)
Q2 24 (17%)
Q3 19 (13%)
Q4 11 (8%)

Attention in the last three years

−14%
citations received, relative to the field
−30%
papers published, relative to the field
1,244
citations received 2023–2025

The topic is declining: citations received by its papers went from 938 (2020–2022) to 1,244 (2023–2025), while those of the whole field grew 1.55 times. Citations received in those years by all papers on the topic are counted, including older ones.

Who leads the topic in the last three years

  • Davide Viaggi · BOLOGNA · 136 citations received 2023–2025 from papers on the topic
  • Giovanni Quaranta · BASILICATA · 108 citations received 2023–2025 from papers on the topic
  • Stefano Targetti · BOLOGNA · 108 citations received 2023–2025 from papers on the topic
  • Daniel Vecchiato · PADOVA · 105 citations received 2023–2025 from papers on the topic
  • Rosanna Salvia · BASILICATA · 102 citations received 2023–2025 from papers on the topic
02
People
Who works on it

Most active researchers on the topic

By papers on the topic. The last column still shows specialisation, to tell apart those who work on it a lot in absolute terms from those who work on it above all.

Who is most specialised in this topic

Not those who published the most on it, but those who devote the largest share of their output to it compared with the field average. Above 1 there is specialisation; the tick marks parity. Researchers with fewer than three papers on the topic are excluded.

Most active institutions

The number tells how much work on the topic comes from each institution; specialisation tells how much the topic weighs within the institution compared with the field average. A small, focused institution can be more specialised than a large one that does everything.

03
Where
In Italy and worldwide

Institutions in Italy

32institutions of the field work on the topic (with at least one paper)
  1. Padova (Legnaro)22
  2. Firenze18
  3. CREA-PB (Roma)15
  4. Basilicata (Potenza)12
  5. Perugia10
  6. Catania9
  7. Molise (Campobasso)9
  8. Bologna8
24 more institutions on the map · circles proportional to papers on the topic

International collaboration

    04
    Research
    Topics, journals and publications

    Related topics

    The topics that most often appear in the same papers. The number is the papers in common.

    Recurring keywords

    landscapechoice experimentecosystem servicecultural heritagerural landscapeagricultural landscapecontingent valuationwillingness to paybiodiversitygissustainabilityclimate changecommon agricultural policypublic goodrenewable energyforest landscape management planningland degradationland useland use changelandscape managementpreferencerural developmentsouthern europesustainable development

    Main journals

    Most cited publications on the topic

    Explore the Observatory → All topics